Page 6 April 21, 2016 PUBLIC NOTICES URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2112 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE IMPOSING TECHNICAL REVIEW AND STUDY REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS IN THE R-4 AND MIXED USE OVERLAY ZONES, AMENDING THE HAWTHORNE MUNICIPAL CODE, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION UNDER CEQA WHEREAS, the City of Hawthorne (City) initiated amendments to the Hawthorne Municipal Code to impose technical review and study requirements for multi-family development projects in the Mixed Use Overlay and R-4 Maximum Density Zone so as to implement environmental mitigation measures regarding traffic safety, traffic circulation, and sewer impacts; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with these amendments and this Ordinance, the City initiated amendments and additions to the design and development standards for the Mixed Use Overlay and R-4 Maximum Density Zone by way of Ordinance No. 2107, which are also intended to incorporate environmental mitigation measures and to address density, trash storage areas and parking impacts of developments in those Zones (Application 2016ZA04); and WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Clearinghouse No. 2009061099, was prepared for the Mixed Use Overlay (MUO) and R-4 Zone project, and, on June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7376 and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for that project, adopted Findings of Fact, Statement of Over-Riding Consideration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and WHEREAS, on March 27, 2012, the City enacted Ordinance No. 2016, which eliminated the Conditional Use Permit requirement for multifamily residential housing in the R-4 and MUO zones pursuant to Government Code Sections 65583.2(h)–(i) and 65589.4; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65583.2(i) allows cities to enact “objective, quantifiable, written development standards” for residential development if those standards do not prevent the city from achieving its share of the regional housing need; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2012, the City adopted the “Design Guide for Highest Density Residential and Mixed Use Development,” dated June 22, 2012, (“Design Guide”) which Guide is intended to establish clear and useful criteria for the planning, design, and aesthetics of highest-density residential and mixed-use developments in the City; and WHEREAS, The Design Guide was adopted by Ordinance No. 2022 and added as Appendix B to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hawthorne Municipal Code (“HMC”), and is required to be complied with in the development of high density residential and mixed-use developments pursuant to Sections 17.19.017 (Design and development standards) and 17.19.060 (Property development standards and site plan review) of the HMC; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2022 also adopted development and security standards for the Mixed Use Overlay and R-4 Zones in Chapters 17.19 and 17.87 of Title 17 (Zoning) of the HMC; and WHEREAS, the City now seeks to impose technical review and study requirements to mitigate impacts to traffic safety, traffic circulation, and sewer capacities; and WHEREAS, the intent and purpose of this Ordinance is to continue to accommodate and enable multi-family residential development projects that are sufficient to meet the City’s regional housing needs allocation and without discretionary review approval while at the same time protecting the public health, safety, and welfare through objective, quantifiable, and written development standards applicable to high-density development projects. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: The City Council finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this Ordinance are true and correct. CEQA Findings. On June 14, 2011, the City certified an FEIR for the adoption of the Mixed Use Overlay and R-4 Zones (State Clearinghouse No. 2009061099). This Ordinance does not expand the land area for those Zones, does not increase allowable densities in those zones, and does not add new uses into those Zones. Accordingly, this Ordinance is within the scope of the project reviewed in that EIR and does not create any new or more severe impacts than the project evaluated in that EIR. As certified, the FEIR required an Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Program pursuant to CEQA Section 21081.6. That program required mitigation measures to address impacts under the following categories: aesthetic; air quality; public services; traffic and circulation; utilities and service systems; water supply and quality; construction-related noise; construction-related traffic; and constructionrelated air quality. B. Specifically, the mitigation monitoring program includes the following measures: (1) “As determined by the City, all applicants will provide information about the area-wide condition of the local sewer system serving respective sites, to the satisfaction of the City. If the conditions of the local sewer lines are not adequate to accommodate flows the developer(s) will contribute funds to identify area-wide improvements, including replacing the existing sewer line serving the site with a larger diameter line, as determined by the City;” (2) “As determined by the City, individual future developments will be required to prepare traffic studies that identify potential impacts and mitigation measures required for an individual project to reduce impacts on the street network and Congestion Management Program (CMP) facilities, including appropriate freeway segments; ” and (3) “Space will be allocated either within the buildings or in outdoor areas for collection and storage of recyclable materials. Plans for space allocation for recycling will be subject to City review and approval, upon application for a building or occupancy permit.” C. This Ordinance is intended to implement mitigation measures required under the FEIR’s mitigation monitoring program using defined development standards for the Mixed Use Overlay and R-4 Zones. Therefore, this Ordinance is within the scope of that EIR and implements its mitigation program. Accordingly, the City Council finds that no additional environmental review is required. D. The Planning Department Staff determined that the proposed amendments to the HMC contained in this Ordinance constitute a project within the scope of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 5 Project (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 and thus is exempt from environmental review. The amendments do not change the land uses allowed on areas of slopes greater than 20%, do not change allowable land uses or their intensities, and do not result in any increases in density. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department’s determination of exemption and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staff’s determination of exemption. E. Third, the City Council also finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the development standards adopted by this Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City and reduce environmental impacts, and will thereby serve to reduce potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Section 15061(b) (3) of the California Code of Regulations. The City Council finds and determines that the zoning text amendments set forth in Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance are consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan. The changes further Goal 2.0 and Policy 2.8 by ensuring that high-density uses are compatible with existing land use zones and do not adversely affect residents in those zones and by ensuring that multi-family projects do not create significant impacts to traffic circulation, traffic safety, sewer capacity, or parking availability. These text amendments further Goal 1.0 and Goal 3.0 by requiring a higher percentage of commercial/retail uses in the Mixed Use Overlay zone. The text amendments are also consistent with the purposes and intent of the R-4 and Mixed Use Overlay zones and are compatible with other uses in the zones. They do not conflict with the goals and policies in the General Plan. The development standards specified are appropriate and necessary to ensure that the uses specified do not have a negative impact on the community’s public health, safety, and welfare. Chapter 13.64 (Public Sewer Capacity) of Division II (Sewage And Waste Disposal) of Title 13 (Waters and Sewers) shall be amended to add new Section 13.64.030 (“Study requirements for specified development projects”) to read as follows: “13.64.030 Study requirement for specified development projects. A. A sewer capacity study shall be required for any of the following development projects: 1. A multi-family project [(a) in the R-4 zone; (b) with a density of 1.0 floor-to-area ratio and above; or (c) containing more than 10 dwelling units]. 2. A mixed-use project that includes more than 10 units of multi-family housing. B. A Licensed Civil Engineer, retained by the city at the applicant’s sole expense, shall prepare the sewer capacity study. C. The sewer capacity study shall determine the existing excess capacity of the sewer system servicing the property on which development is proposed. D. Based on the estimates in Section 13.64.020, the applicant must show that sewage flow from the project will not exceed the excess capacity of the existing sewer system. E. If the study finds that the sewage flow from the project will exceed the system’s excess capacity, the applicant shall make any alterations necessary to ensure that sewer flow will not exceed capacity, including the construction of additional sewer capacity or the implementation of project features to reduce flow rates.” The Hawthorne Municipal Code is hereby amended to add Title 14 to read as follows: “Title 14 T E C H N I C A L R E V I E W A N D S T U D Y R E Q U I R E M E N T S FOR SPECIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Chapters: 14.02 Administrative Plan Review 14.04 Traffic Impact Studies 14.06 Site-Specific Traffic Safety Studies Chapter 14.02 Administrative Plan Review Sections: 14.02.040 Applicability. 14.02.060 Purpose. 14.02.080 Review Process and Scope. 14.02.040 Applicability. Administrative plan review, as defined in Section 14.02.080, shall be required for all multi-family and mixed-use developments in any zone in the City. 14.02.060 Purpose. The purpose of administrative plan review is to provide an informal process by which information about the proposed development project can be shared between an applicant and City staff. A goal of this process is to ensure that development projects satisfy all applicable standards and requirements, and potential problems and solutions in the project design are identified at the earliest possible stage and before formal applications are filed with the City. By doing so, applicants are able to incorporate those standards, requirements, and solutions in their plans when submitted for formal approval. Furthermore, administrative plan review is intended to expedite and streamline the formal review process. The information gathered and exchanged at this early stage is intended to give the applicant and City a procedure to improve the design of the project, ensure that it incorporates required elements and design features, and lessens the possibility that significant corrections will be needed late in the process, thereby avoiding potential delay in the formal review and approval of the project. 14.02.080 Review Process and Scope. A. Administrative plan review shall mean informal review of preliminary development plans for technical compliance with the requirements of this Title, Chapter 8.50 (Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control) of Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 13 (Waters and Sewers), Title 15 (Buildings and Construction), Title 17 (Zoning), to the extent applicable, and any other applicable provisions of the Hawthorne Municipal Code and State and Federal law. B. Administrative plan review shall involve City staff representatives from appropriate City departments, including, but not limited to, Planning, Building and Safety, and Public Works. C. Administrative plan review shall be an informal review of preliminary plans. Completion of this process does not involve or constitute the granting of any rights to development and does not result in any ministerial or discretionary development approval. No fee shall be charged to the applicant for its submittal for, or participation in, administrative plan review. Chapter 14.04 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Sections: 14.04.020 Applicability. 14.04.040 Study requirements. 14.04.060 Standards. 14.04.080 Requirements for project approval. 14.04.020 Applicability. A traffic impact study shall be required for any of the following projects: A. Any multi-family project (a) in the R-4 zone, (b) that is likely to add 43 or more peak hour trips, or (c) multi-family project with 40 or more units]. B. Any mixed-use project (a) that includes more than 40 multi-family residential units; (b) with ground-level multi-family residential units; or (c) that is likely to add 43 or more peak hour trips. This chapter shall not limit the effect of any other requirements under local, state, or federal law. 14.04.040 Study requirements. A. A Licensed Traffic Engineer consultant, retained by the city at the applicant’s sole expense, shall prepare the traffic impact study. The project applicant shall submit the traffic impact study to the Department of Public Works as part of the project application. B. The traffic Impact study shall determine the current and projected (with project) levels of service and volume-to capacity ratio at all potentially affected intersections within a one-mile radius of the proposed project. The levels of service shall be based on Table 1 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan using the Intersection Capacity Utilization method. C. Traffic impact Study shall also determine the current and projected (with project) impacts at the following California Department of Transportation off-ramps within a three-mile radius of the project site utilizing strict Caltrans guidelines: WB 105 off-ramp to Hawthorne Blvd. WB 105 off-ramp to Prairie Ave. WB 105 off-ramp to Crenshaw Blvd. EB 105 off-ramp to 120th St. NB 405 off-ramp El Segundo Blvd. SB 405 off-ramp to La Cienega/El Segundo Blvd. SB 405 off-ramp to El Segundo Blvd. NB 405 off-ramp to Rosecrans Ave. SB 405 off-ramp to Rosecrans Ave. SB 405 off-ramp to Hindry Ave. 14.04.060 Project impact standards. A project specified in Section 14.04.020 shall satisfy the following traffic impact development standards: A. The proposed development will not increase Intersection Capacity Utilization by: 0.01 or more at an intersection operating at an E or F Level of Service; 0.02 or more at an intersection operating at a D Level of Service; or 0.04 or more at an intersection operating at a C Level of Service. B. The State Department of Transportation’s “Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies,” December 2002. (See www.dot.ca.gov/ hq/tpp/offices/ocp/igr_ceqa_files/tisguide.pdf) 14.04.080 Requirements for project approval. If the study determines that the project will cause traffic impacts that exceed the development standards in Section 14.04.060, the applicant shall either (i) alter the proposed project to conform to those standards or (ii) include specific traffic and roadway improvements to address the traffic generated by the project. Chapter 14.06 SITE-SPECIFIC TRAFFIC SAFETY STUDIES Sections: 14.06.020 Applicability. 14.06.040 Study requirements. 14.06.060 Traffic safety standards. 14.06.020 Applicability. A site-specific traffic safety study shall be required for the following projects: A. A multi-family project (a) in the R-4 zone; (b) that is likely to add 43 or more peak hour trips, or (c) multi-family project with 40 or more units. B. A mixed-use project (a) that includes more than 40 multi-family residential units; or (b) with ground-level multi-family residential units. 14.06.040 Study requirements. A. A Licensed Traffic Engineer, retained by the city at the applicant’s sole expense, shall prepare the traffic safety study. The project applicant shall submit the traffic safety study to the Department of Public Works as part of the project application. If the applicant submits a traffic safety study prepared by a consultant not retained by the city, the city may retain, at the applicant’s sole expense, a traffic consultant to verify the applicant’s study. B. The traffic safety study shall assess the safety of traffic flows within the project site and at each ingress and egress point of the proposed project. 14.06.060 Traffic safety standards. The project shall satisfy one or more of the following traffic safety development standards: A. A vision clearance triangle shall be provided and maintained, where the legs of the vision clearance triangle are a minimum of 15 feet in length as measured from the edge of the driveway at the property line and from 2 to 8 feet above the driveway height. B. All relevant sight distances and other design requirements set forth in Chapter 400 of the California Department of Transportation’s Highway Design Manual.” Urgency Declaration. This Ordinance is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety and shall take effect immediately upon adoption pursuant to California Government Code Section 36937(b). The facts constituting the urgency include the following. First, multi-family and mixed-use high-density development in concentrated areas of the City poses a risk of exceeding existing infrastructure capacity by generating demands on sewer, water, storm drains, and transportation facilities that cannot be accommodated by existing infrastructure. Second, the City’s interim moratorium on those high-density projects will expire on March 27, 2016, unless extended, whereas this Ordinance would become effective on April 21, 2016, unless effective immediately. If neither this Ordinance nor the moratorium are in place for that 25-day period, it would create a regulatory condition allowing projects without adequate infrastructure and other onsite facilities necessary to service them. This Ordinance’s development standards and study requirements prevent imminent adverse effects on infrastructure capacities by ensuring that approved projects are serviced by adequate infrastructure facilities. For these reasons, and based on other evidence in the record of these proceedings, the immediate effectiveness of this Ordinance is necessary to preserve the public peace, health, and safety. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the summarized ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hawthorne, or if there is none, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City of Hawthorne, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 22nd day of March, 2016. ALEX VARGAS, MAYOR City of Hawthorne, California ATTEST: NORB HUBER, CITY CLERK City of Hawthorne, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUSSELL I. MIYAHIRA, CITY ATTORNEY City of Hawthorne, California Monica Dicrisci, the duly appointed Deputy City Clerk of the City of Hawthorne, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Urgency Ordinance, No. 2112 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Hawthorne, at their regular meeting of the City Council held March 22, 2016 and that it was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers Awad, Reyes English, Michelin, Valentine, Mayor Vargas. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Deputy City Clerk City of Hawthorne, California Hawthorne Press Tribune Pub. 4/21/16 HH-25068 NOTICE INVITING BIDS DISTRICT HAWTHORNE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Carpet and Flooring Time and Material PROJECT NO Service Bid Number M15-16-17 BIDS DUE BY May 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM Sharp! SUBMIT BIDS TO Hawthorne School District 13021 S. Yukon Ave. Hawthorne, California 90250 BID AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE http://www.hawthorne.k12.ca.us/bids DEADLINE FOR RFI’s May 3, 2016; 4:00 PM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Hawthorne School District of Los Angeles County, California, acting by and through its Governing Board, hereinafter referred to as the “Owner” or “District”, will receive prior to the above stated time and date sealed bids for the award of a Contract for the following: SERVICE BID NO. M15-16-17 CARPET AND FLOORING TIME AND MATERIAL. All bids shall be made and presented only on the forms presented by the Owner. Bids shall be received in the Office of the Hawthorne School District at 13021 S. Yukon Ave., Hawthorne, California 90250 and shall be opened and publicly read aloud at the above state time and place. Any bids received after the time specified above or after any extensions due to material changes shall be returned unopened. Allocate extra time due to parking restrictions when submitting bids. Minimum contract term is one (1) year. Quoted prices must stay in effect for one (1) year after award of bid and may be extended upon mutual consent of District and Contractor for an additional four (4) years in accordance with provisions contained in Education Code Section17596 and the bid documents. CONTRACTOR should consult the General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions, and General Requirements regarding Milestones and Liquidated Damages. Each bidder shall be a licensed contractor pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, and be licensed to perform the work called for in the Contract Documents. The successful bidder must possess a valid and active Class C15 License at the time of bid and throughout the duration of this Contract. The Contractor’s California State License number shall be clearly stated on the bidder’s proposal Subcontractors shall be licensed pursuant to California law for the trades necessary to perform the Work called for in the Contract Documents. Each bid must strictly conform with and be responsive to the Contract Documents as defined in the General Conditions. In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the Owner will permit the substitution of securities for any moneys withheld by the Owner to ensure performance under the Contract. Prevailing wages are applicable to the Project. These per diem rates, including holiday and overtime work, as well as employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, and similar purposes, are available from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq., it shall be mandatory upon the Contractor to whom the Contract is awarded, and upon any subcontractor under such Contractor, to pay not less than the said specified rates to all workers employed by them in the execution of the Contract. A contractor or subcontractor shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in the Labor Code, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. It is not a violation of this section for an unregistered contractor to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the contractor is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall furnish certified payroll records as required pursuant Labor Code section 1776 directly to the Labor Commissioner in accordance with Labor Code section 1771.4 on at least on a monthly basis (or more frequently if required by the District or the Labor Commissioner) and in a format prescribed by the Labor Commissioner. Monitoring and enforcement of the prevailing wage laws and related requirements will be performed by the Labor Commissioner/ Department of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Separate payment and performance bonds, each in an amount equal to 100% of the total Contract amount issued by a California admitted surety as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, are required, and shall be provided to the Owner prior to execution of the Contract and shall be in the form set forth in the Contract Documents. It is each bidder’s sole responsibility to ensure its bid is timely delivered and received at the location designated as specified above. Any bid received at the designated location after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. Bid Security. Each Bid Proposal shall be accompanied by Bid Security in an amount Ten Percent (10%) of Maximum amount of Bid. Failure of any Bid Proposal to be accompanied by Bid Security in the form and in the amount required shall render such Bid Proposal to be non-responsive and rejected by the District. No Withdrawal of Bid Proposals. No Bidder shall withdraw its Bid Proposal for a period of ninety (90) days after the award of the Contract by the District’s Board of Education. During this time, all Bidders shall guarantee prices quoted in their respective Bid Proposals. Substitute Security. In accordance with the provisions of California Public Contract Code §22300, substitution of eligible and equivalent securities for any monies withheld by the District to ensure the Contractor’s performance under the Contract will be permitted at the request and expense of the Contractor. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Bidder to whom the Contract is awarded shall have thirty (30) days following action by the District’s Board of Education to award the Contract to such Bidder to submit its written request to the District to permit the substitution of securities for retention. The failure of the Bidder to make such written request to the District within said thirty (30) day period shall be deemed a waiver of the Bidder’s rights under California Public Contract Code §22300. Waiver of Irregularities. The District reserves the right to reject any or all Bid Proposals, make multiple awards, or to waive any irregularities or informalities in any Bid Proposal or in the bidding. Award of Contract. The Contract for the Work, if awarded, will be by action of the District’s Board of Education to the responsible Bidder submitting the lowest responsive Bid Proposal. If the Bid Proposal requires Bidders to propose prices for Alternate Bid Items, the District’s selection of Alternate Bid Items, if any, for determination of the lowest priced Bid Proposal and for inclusion in the scope of the Contract to be awarded shall be in accordance with this Notice and the Instructions for Bidders. Inquiries and Clarifications. The Bidder is advised that all inquiries and clarifications about the Bid Documents, Drawings, Specifications, etc., shall be submitted to the District in writing at least seven (7) days before the bid opening date. The District will respond at its earliest possible opportunity. Verbal communication by either party with regard to this matter is invalid. Inquiries shall be sent in writing to Aneska Ines Kekula at ikekula@hawthorne.k12.ca.us or (310) 675-9464 by May 3, 2016, at 4:00 PM It is each bidder’s sole responsibility to ensure its bid is timely delivered and received at the location designated as specified above. Any bid received at the designated location after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. Aneska Ines Kekula Purchasing Director HAWTHORNE SCHOOL DISTRICT Los Angeles County, State of California FOR: The Board of Trustees Publication: Herald Publication and Hawthorne School District online 1st Publication: April 21, 2016 2nd Publication: April 28, 2016 Hawthorne Press Tribune Pub. 4/21, 4/28/16 HH-25076 Success is how high you bounce when you hit the bottom. -George S. Patton LIEN SALE: 2006 BMW VIN: WBAEH13406CR50737 LIC: 6YIY450 To be sold: 5/5/2016 Address: 14201 S. HALLDALE AVE. GARDENA, CA 90249 INGLEWOOD NEWS: 4/21/16 HI-25077 LIEN SALE: 1998 BAYLINER VIN: YAMA1701H798 LIC: 9145PE To be sold: 5/9/2016 Address: 3163 W. PICO BLVD. LOS ANGELES, CA 90019 INGLEWOOD NEWS: 4/21/16 HI-25078 LIEN SALE: BOAT/TRAILER COMBINATION 1) 2003 BAYLINER, 2) 2003 KARAV VIN: 1) USHN26CLD303, 2) 5KTBS19163F110583 LIC: 1) 5277RA, 2) 4EF2780 To be sold: 5/9/2016 Address: 1501 N. ALAMEDA ST. COMPTON, CA 90220 INGLEWOOD NEWS: 4/21/16 HI-25079 Request for Proposals City of Hawthorne Development Opportunity Integrated Commercial (Hotel/Restaurant/Retail) The City of Hawthorne is soliciting proposals from qualified firms, organizations, and/or developers who are interested in acquiring and developing a 4.3 acre site located near City Hall. The City desires to attract a private developer to purchase and develop the site into a high quality integrated commercial development with hotel, restaurant, and retail uses. To participate in this bidding process and obtain further information please contact Maria Majcherek, Associate Planner, at 310-349- 2972 or at mmajcherek@cityofhawthorne.org The deadline to submit proposals is no later than May 17, 2016 by 3:00 p.m. Hawthorne Press Tribune Pub. 4/21, 4/28/16 HH-25074
Inglewood_FB_042116_FNL_lorez
To see the actual publication please follow the link above